1. Elizabeth Young-Bruehl wrote in
“The Anatomy of Prejudices” that hate
is classified into three distinct kinds of hate; “obsessive, hysterical and
narcissistic.” Can hate be classified as anything but “hate” itself? Do you
think she was justified in her classifications?
2. We FINALLY elected the first
African-American President in history! Do you think it’s helped us be more
tolerant of other races? Or did it make us feel like we’re “making up” for
slavery and all the horrors we put them through as a race?
3. Was Andrew Sullivan on point or
wrong by saying: “A free country will always mean a hateful country?” Explain.
This was by far the best
article we have read so far! I couldn’t agree with Sullivan more than when he
said that: “A free country will always be a hateful country.” To some this may
sound insulting, mean and depressing. But think about it…WE ARE A FREE
COUNTRY!! Isn’t it our right to hate or love whatever or whoever we may
choose?!! I should think so. Don’t go out murdering people or anything, but
think and say whatever you like…please! I miss hearing white people being
called “Crackers.” That’s what we are right? Our founding fathers would be flabbergasted
at all these new “hate laws” that place innocent people (most “hate crimes” don’t
involve violence) in jail. Our ancestors came over here to be free of England
and religious persecution. So why then
is “hating” on someone, whatever the reason may be, a crime now? Isn’t it just
clogging up our jail system with people simply practicing their “freedom of
speech” as stated in the First Amendment? It’s a pretty sketchy thing to talk
about and there are so many variations and levels of “hate” when involved with
committing a crime. But to take away anyone’s right to act or think as long as
it doesn’t involve injury or death is unconstitutional. This practice is often
referred to as Libertarianism, and it ain't such a bad idea! And as long as there is hate, we have love. Isn’t
love the most beautiful single emotion in the Universe?! Don’t we all yearn for
love? There is a yin and yang to the Universe that cannot be touched without
chaos ensuing. Sullivan says in closing: “In some ways, some expression of
prejudice serves a useful social purpose. It lets of steam; it allows natural
tensions to express themselves incrementally; it can siphon off conflict
through words, rather than actions.” I totally concur with him on
this. I’m not advocating people freely and violently expressing ultimate
hatred! It just makes sense to me what Sullivan was trying to say. We can’t
bottle up our natural emotions inside that we feel towards other people
different than ourselves. We are expressive and free beings that are not going
to change. And to ask us to do so is silly. Call me crazy, a lot of people do;
but I think Andrew Sullivan was dead on with this article. Enough said.
No comments:
Post a Comment